THE TRINITY

In recent years (the past 10 years or more), I have pondered my understanding of the doctrine of the Trinity from time to time. This has been one of those topics that I have been very reluctant to address. I am not sure if I can adequately articulate what I have come to believe based on scripture and the comfort of the Lord, but maybe I will get better over time.

I absolutely believe that God is revealed to us in three persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. However, I think there are a lot of misconceptions that confuse people in how to correctly understand God in three persons.

I have found that I have great peace, and my soul is at rest in understanding God in three persons in the way that I am about to share with you.

First, allow me to say that understanding the identity of Jesus from the Father is somewhat easy. Jesus became human, the Father did not. Jesus is fully God and fully man, the Father is fully God and not man. Jesus was tempted as a man, God cannot be tempted with evil. Jesus died and rose again, the Father has never died. Jesus lived in the world and was clothed in human flesh, the Father dwells in unapproachable light and has never been seen by any man according to scripture. I could go on, but hopefully you get the picture.

I think many Christians can understand the distinction between the Father and the Son, but what about the Spirit? How should we understand the Holy Spirit in relation to the Father and the Son? For me, there is a settled peace in my heart when I think of the Holy Spirit as the Spirit of the One True God.

In the New Testament God, and the Father, refer to the same person unless it’s a specific reference to the Son or the Spirit. The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of God, and not a Spirit who is in union with the Father and the Son who together constitute God. The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of the One True God, and the One true God is the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.

It seems to always trouble and grieve my spirit when I hear the Holy Spirit referenced as if he is an independent being from God rather than the Spirit of God. The scriptures reveal that the Holy Spirit is the Spirit of God.

And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh… ~ Acts 2:17

For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. ~ Romans 8:14

But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God. Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. Which things also we speak, not in the words which man’s wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. ~ 1 Corinthians 2:9-13

Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? ~ 1 Corinthians 3:16


He therefore that despiseth, despiseth not man, but God, who hath also given unto us his Holy Spirit. ~ 1 Thessalonians 4:8

I could go on listing more scriptures, but as you can see from these, the Holy Spirit is God’s Spirit, and not another being outside of God who gave his Son.

I believe that the scriptures clearly communicate to us that God has a Son (For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son), and the Holy Spirit is his Spirit, the Spirit of the God who gave his Son.

I honestly believe that there is a wrong paradigm that has influenced many to not understand this simple truth that the Holy Spirit is God’s own Spirit. And I believe this wrong paradigm is at the very foundation of so much of the false doctrines and practices within the Charismatic sects of Christianity.

When you separate the Holy Spirit (in your thinking) from the One who gave his Son, you then become susceptible to false doctrines that are not grounded in the person of God’s Son.

According to the New Testament, Jesus is the revelation of the Father to fallen humanity. In Jesus we see God, we see the Father, and through Jesus alone we partake of his Holy Spirit.

Now, there is much more I could say, and maybe I will write more along these lines down the road. However, I am still processing how to say it and make it clear so that I will faithfully minister the truth of God and edify others in the Lord and not confuse anyone.

For me, it is very comforting to think of the Holy Spirit as God’s own Spirit. He is the Spirit of my God living in me. There is one God, he has a Son, and he bestows his Spirit on all who trust in him.

Blessing…

A SAD DAY IN THE UNITED STATES

I just wanted to take a moment and express my grief over the evil that is going on in the government of the United States. I am ashamed for the United States because Donald Trump and J.D. Vance’s treatment of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was absolutely repulsive.

Our current President, Donald Trump has no respect for the very office of President he holds. He behaves like a spoiled brat in an old man’s body. He has no dignity, no decorum, and he has defiled the honour of the office of the President of the United States.

If Donald Trump is in office by divine providence, I perceive that the United States is under the judgment of God, and I fear for my nation. If it is not divine providence, I pray that somehow enough republicans in congress will find the courage to hold him accountable.

This is not good. I will be deleting this post, but I had to just say something.

THE BIBLICAL NARRATIVE OF THE CROSS AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS ~ Lesson #2, This is the Lord’s doing and it is marvelous in our eyes

In the New Testament, Jesus confronted the leaders of Israel for their part in the continued rejection of God’s servants who were sent to Israel. By their rejection of Jesus, they were complicit in the persecution and blood shedding of all the prophets and righteous men throughout Israel’s history.

And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers. Woe unto you! for ye build the sepulchres of the prophets, and your fathers killed them. Truly ye bear witness that ye allow the deeds of your fathers: for they indeed killed them, and ye build their sepulchres. Therefore also said the wisdom of God, I will send them prophets and apostles, and some of them they shall slay and persecute. That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required of this generation; From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation. Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered. And as he said these things unto them, the scribes and the Pharisees began to urge him vehemently, and to provoke him to speak of many things: Laying wait for him, and seeking to catch something out of his mouth, that they might accuse him. ~ Luke 11:46-54

Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous, And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city: That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar. Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation. O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate. ~ Matthew 23:29 -38

These two sections of scripture may seem as if they have absolutely nothing to do with the cross and resurrection of Jesus, but in fact, they do because they are part of the backdrop that leads to the scandal of the cross

With these two sections of scripture in mind, let’s read again from Matthew 21:33-42 where Jesus gives the parable of the vineyard.

Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country: And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it. And the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another. Again, he sent other servants more than the first: and they did unto them likewise. But last of all he sent unto them his son, saying, They will reverence my son. But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance. And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him. ~ Matthew 21:33-39

Notice how the parable of the vineyard runs parallel with the words of Jesus to the leaders of Israel in the two opening sections of scripture above (Luke 11:46-54 and Matthew 23:29 -38).

Within the story of Israel, the death of Jesus is the culmination of the rejection of the God of Israel by his people. This is a sobering truth, but it is also one that will bring us into a greater sense of humility and love for the grace and mercy of God because we all deserve judgment.

Thankfully, the parable of the vineyard does not end at verse 39 with the death of the Son. We have 3 more verses that lead our eyes to the resurrection of God’s Son.

When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen? They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons. Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? ~ Matthew 21:40-42 

Jesus is the stone the builders rejected, and as we move forward we are going to unpack that even further, but for now I want to draw you attention to what is said immediately afterwards, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner.

The rejected stone (rejected by men) is the stone that God has chosen as the cornerstone. According to the scriptures, this is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes!

In the Bible, when we read about Jesus as the stone the builders rejected, this refers to the sufferings of Christ. When we read about Jesus as the cornerstone, that is resurrection language. The resurrected Christ is the foundational stone of the house of God in God’s new creation.

Therefore thus saith the Lord God, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste. ~ Isaiah 28:16

In the parable of the vineyard, Jesus asks “Did ye never read in the scriptures that the rejected stone would become the cornerstone?”

This was God’s foreordained plan and is that which had been told to us by the prophets. The stone which the builders refused has become the head stone of the corner. This is the Lord’s doing; it is marvelous in our eyes. ~Psalm 118:22-23

I can not stress enough how important it is for us to grasp the impact of these words, “This is the Lord’s doing; it is marvelous in our eyes.” This is the Lord’s doing. Not the theories, but this. In our first lesson I referenced that there are multiple theories (views) that are taught regarding the atonement. These theories serve as a framework endeavoring to explain the cross. Yet none of them have as their foundation the rejected stone becoming the cornerstone, which is the Lord’s doing within the story of Israel.

The theories (moral influence, ransom, Christus victor, satisfaction, penal substitution, governmental, and scapegoat theory), all have aspects of truth, but none of them can open our understanding regarding the cross and resurrection like the biblical narrative can.

We are just getting started in this study, and I hope you will continue to follow along. Until our next lesson, remember that Jesus, who was rejected by men, was chosen by God and this is the Lord’s doing! And when you see it, it will be marvelous in your eyes. 

Until lesson #3, blessings…

THE BIBLICAL NARRATIVE OF THE CROSS AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS ~ Lesson #1, The Parable of the Vineyard

In Matthew 21:33-42, Jesus gives the parable of the vineyard as an illustration regarding his death and resurrection within the context of God’s relationship with Israel. This parable is also recored in Mark 12:1-12 and Luke 20:9-18. Let’s begin by reading verses 33-39 in Matthew 21.

Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country: And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it. And the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another. Again, he sent other servants more than the first: and they did unto them likewise. But last of all he sent unto them his son, saying, They will reverence my son. But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance. And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him. ~ Matthew 21:33-39

The words emphasized in bold and italicized font in the verses above represent key truths that will help us understand the biblical narrative regarding the cross and resurrection of Jesus. Let’s take a look at each of them and give a brief definition of what they represent.

1. The householder who planted a vineyard represents God himself. 

2. The vineyard is the nation of Israel. 

3. The husbandmen are the leaders and rulers within Israel.

4. The servants are the prophets and righteous men that God sent to Israel and their leaders.

5. The Son, who is also the heir, is Jesus.

Now before we move forward let’s look at some verses which refer to Israel as God’s vineyard.

Thou hast brought a vine out of Egypt: thou hast cast out the heathen, and planted it. Thou preparedst room before it, and didst cause it to take deep root, and it filled the land. ~ Psalm 80:8-9 

Now I will sing to my wellbeloved a song of my beloved touching his vineyard. My wellbeloved hath a vineyard in a very fruitful hill: And he fenced it, and gathered out the stones thereof, and planted it with the choicest vine, and built a tower in the midst of it, and also made a winepress therein: and he looked that it should bring forth grapes, and it brought forth wild grapes. And now, O inhabitants of Jerusalem, and men of Judah, judge, I pray you, betwixt me and my vineyard. What could have been done more to my vineyard, that I have not done in it? Wherefore, when I looked that it should bring forth grapes, brought it forth wild grapes? And now go to; I will tell you what I will do to my vineyard: I will take away the hedge thereof, and it shall be eaten up; and break down the wall thereof, and it shall be trodden down: And I will lay it waste: it shall not be pruned, nor digged; but there shall come up briers and thorns: I will also command the clouds that they rain no rain upon it. For the vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah his pleasant plant: and he looked for judgment, but behold oppression; for righteousness, but behold a cry. ~ Isaiah 5:1-7

Yet I had planted thee
a noble vine, wholly a right seed: how then art thou turned into the degenerate plant of a strange vine unto me? ~ Jeremiah 2:21 

Israel’s role as the vineyard of the Lord is extremely important to remember in any study of the cross and resurrection of Jesus, because the death and resurrection of Jesus happened within the context of the story of Israel as the vineyard that God planted.

Now, I need you to brace yourself, especially if your foundational views of the cross is not rooted within the context of the story of Israel. Within Western Christianity there has been much debate over different theories of the Atonement, and listed below are some the most prominent ones.

1. The moral influence theory. 

2. The ransom theory.

3. Christus Victor.

4. The satisfaction theory.

5. The Penal Substitutionary theory.

6. The Governmental theory.

7. The scapegoat theory.

These theories are sometimes referred to as models of the Atonement, and are presented as a framework to understand the crucifixion of Jesus. Though they all have some aspects of truth, there is one thing that they all have in common: they are not predicated on the story of Israel. The biblical narrative in the New Testament regarding the cross and resurrection of Jesus is given to us within the context of the story of Israel.

To be sure, Bible verses can be stringed together to support any of the theories of Atonement referenced above, but none of them are the narrative given to us in the New Testament. The narrative regarding Christ’s death and resurrection as given to us in the New Testament is referred to as the gospel in the book of Acts. In fact, we have approximately 7 gospel sermons recorded in the book of Acts and everyone of them places the cross and resurrection within the context of the story of Israel.

If we omit the story of Israel, we do not have the biblical view of the cross and resurrection. We only have theories. Theories can have some good points, but they can also be cluttered with false ideas rooted in pagan philosophy and thought.

Almost all of Western Christianity has been indoctrinated with theories of the Atonement rather than the biblical narrative. Nothing speaks to reality of this more than the way that God’s role in the death of Christ is understood.

In this study, I appeal to you to be patient with me and consider the truths I am going to present to you from the narrative given to us in the New Testament. The more we see and understand the biblical narrative, the less appealing theories of the Atonement will be. When the cross is understood within the context of the narrative, the resurrection takes on a whole new meaning.

Lacking in most, if not all theories of the Atonement, is the powerful, life changing work of God in the resurrection and exaltation of Jesus. In the biblical narrative, the resurrection and exaltation of Jesus is not an afterthought, but the beginning of new creation in the Messiah.

The theories of Atonement often fail the biblical narrative because of one underlying concept more than any other, and that is the role that God the Father had in the death of his Son.

If we understand the cross and resurrection within the context of the story of Israel (i.e., Israel’s covenantal relationship with God from Abraham to Christ), our minds will be renewed to the Lord’s doing, and it will be as was prophesied, marvelous in our eyes! While it may be painful to unlearn some of the indoctrination of the theories, waiting for us on the other side is a fresh and powerful understanding of the resurrection that we have never had before.

The parable of the vineyard will be our launching point into this study of the cross and resurrection of Jesus, and as we journey through the narrative given to us in the New Testament, we will see over and over again that the parable of the vineyard is the perfect framework for properly understanding what actually happened when Christ died and rose again.

As we can see in the parable of the vineyard, the Lord of the vineyard (which is a portrait of God the Father) was not the one condemning his Son. Instead, it was the husbandmen who mistreated and killed the Son. They did to the Son as they had done to the other servants which the Lord of the vineyard had sent to them.

This is a portrait of all the prophets and righteous men that God had sent to Israel and their leaders, to call them to repentance and to be his fruitful vineyard. Yet they continued to rebel. Finally, God sent his only begotten Son and they rejected him and put him to death.

This is a good point to end this first lesson. We will pick up here in lesson #2.

Blessings…

THE CUP FROM WHICH OUR LORD DID DRINK

Then cometh Jesus with them unto a place called Gethsemane, and saith unto the disciples, Sit ye here, while I go and pray yonder. And he took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, and began to be sorrowful and very heavy. Then saith he unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death: tarry ye here, and watch with me. And he went a little farther, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt.~  Matthew 26:36-39

It has been suggested that the cup to which Jesus makes reference is none other than the cup of God’s wrath. But is it? Those who advocate that Christ suffered under the wrath of God will sometimes refer to this mention of the cup as evidence to support their theory.

Indeed, there are scriptures which reference the cup of God’s wrath. For example: Psalm 75:8; Isaiah 51:17; Jeremiah 25:15-17; Ezekiel 23:32-34; and Habakkuk 2:16 all use the cup as a metaphor to refer to God’s wrath which comes on the ungodly and not on the godly.

Consider for example the following from Psalm 75.

But God is the judge: he putteth down one, and setteth up another. For in the hand of the Lord there is a cup, and the wine is red; it is full of mixture; and he poureth out of the same: but the dregs thereof, all the wicked of the earth shall wring them out, and drink them. ~ Psalm 75:7-8

Now notice what the Psalmist says next:

But I will declare forever; I will sing praises to the God of Jacob. All the horns of the wicked also will I cut off; but the horns of the righteous shall be exalted. ~ Psalm 75:9-10

When Zacharias (the father of John the Baptist) was filled with the Holy Spirit, he prophesied saying, Blessed be the Lord God of Israel; for he hath visited and redeemed his people, And hath raised up an horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David… ~ Luke 1:67-69

Jesus is the horn of our salvation. In 2 Samuel David declared, The God of my rock; in him will I trust: he is my shield, and the horn of my salvation, my high tower, and my refuge, my saviour; thou savest me from violence. ~ v.3

In Psalm 89 we read the following: Blessed is the people that know the joyful sound: they shall walk, O Lord, in the light of thy countenance. In thy name shall they rejoice all the day: and in thy righteousness shall they be exalted. For thou art the glory of their strength: and in thy favour our horn shall be exalted. ~ v.15-17 

Jesus never ceased to be the horn of our Salvation, thus he never ceased to be the one God favored and in whom we find favor. What so many fail to understand is this all points to the power of the resurrection of Jesus.

If we envision a God who suddenly turned on Jesus, we will never truly grasp the power and glory of his resurrection. Jesus was not abandoned by God nor was he the object of God’s wrath. Jesus always did those things that pleased the Father, and when he laid down his life it was as a sweet fragrance to God, in obedient surrender to the Father’s will.

When Jesus died, he surrendered all to the will of the Father, and lovingly forgave those who were putting him to death. This he did by the grace of God, not as the whipping board for God’s anger.

It truly is disheartening that some have to reach for such texts as Jesus asking for the cup to pass from him if possible and projecting onto that the idea of the cup of God’s wrath. God’s wrath does not come upon the innocent, the just, the pure, or the holy. To claim that this was the cup of God’s wrath is to literally change the very nature and character of God at the darkest hour when his Son trusted him.

If we could but envision a Holy God who raised his Son from the dead because he is just and exalts the righteous, the image of an angry God who needed to take vengeance would melt away.

With regards to the metaphorical language of the cup, we see it used in other ways in scripture that have nothing to do with God’s wrath. For instance, Jeremiah 16:7 speaks of the cup of consolation, Psalm 116:13 refers to the cup of salvation, 1 Corinthians 10:16 mentions the cup of blessing, and Psalm 23:5 tells of the overflowing cup

Consistently the word “cup” is used within scripture as a metaphor but what specifically does it refer to when Jesus employs the use of it in the Garden of Gethsemane?

Well, we can be certain that Jesus drank from the cup of suffering because he laid down his life for our sins. The wages of sin is death, not the wrath of God. The wrath of God comes on those who refuse to turn from their sin, who love their sin, and who despise truth and righteousness.

Now let’s consider what actually happened when Jesus was in the garden of Gethsemane. 

Then cometh Jesus with them unto a place called Gethsemane, and saith unto the disciples, Sit ye here, while I go and pray yonder. And he took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, and began to be sorrowful and very heavy. ~ Matthew 26:36-37

Notice that Jesus took with him Peter and the 2 sons of Zebedee. We’ll come back to this shortly, but let’s continue:

Then saith he unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death: tarry ye here, and watch with me. And he went a little farther, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt. And he cometh unto the disciples, and findeth them asleep, and saith unto Peter, What, could ye not watch with me one hour? Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak. He went away again the second time, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if this cup may not pass away from me, except I drink it, thy will be done. ~ Matthew 26:38-42

Notice that the cup is contextually the will of God for Jesus during this hour  –  if this cup may not pass away from me, except I drink it, thy will be done.

Let’s continue:

And he came and found them asleep again: for their eyes were heavy. And he left them, and went away again, and prayed the third time, saying the same words. Then cometh he to his disciples, and saith unto them, Sleep on now, and take your rest: behold, the hour is at hand, and the Son of man is betrayed into the hands of sinners. Rise, let us be going: behold, he is at hand that doth betray me. And while he yet spake, lo, Judas, one of the twelve, came, and with him a great multitude with swords and staves, from the chief priests and elders of the people. ~ Matthew  26:43-47

Jesus was to endure the betrayal, the arrest, the trial, the mockery, the humiliation, and the suffering of death. This was the cup he was to drink from. There is nothing in context that suggests that Jesus is referring to becoming the subject of God’s wrath when he mentions the cup he was to drink from.

Notice that Jesus took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee. The sons of Zebedee (James and John) had recently been asked by Jesus’ Are you able to drink of the cup that I am going to drink and to be baptized with the baptism that I am going to be baptized with?” To which they responded, We are able ~ Matthew 20:20.

Why would Jesus ask them if they could drink of the cup he would drink from, if his cup was the wrath of God? Notice what Jesus says to them when they said, we are able.

And he saith unto them, Ye shall drink indeed of my cup, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with: but to sit on my right hand, and on my left, is not mine to give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father. ~ Matthew 20:23

Notice that Jesus affirms that they would indeed drink of the cup that Jesus himself would drink. This may very well be the reason he took them with him, along with Peter, as he prayed in Gethsemane. It seems that Jesus, even in this hour of grief, was teaching his disciples what it truly meant to drink from his cup, for they called to suffer for his sake.

When Jesus said, My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death, there must have been a desire for his friends to be near him in his deepest time of trouble and sorrow. Jesus was tempted in all points as we are and just as we need friends near in times of distress, so Jesus must have longed for his friends to be there for him. Jesus asks, “…tarry ye here, and watch with me.” 

There certainly is strong evidence that the cup refers to the sufferings that Jesus was about to experience (v.45-46) and this becomes even more apparent when we consider John 18:10-11 along with Matthew 26:51-54 which refer to the same event

Then Simon Peter having a sword drew it, and smote the high priest’s servant, and cut off his right ear. The servant’s name was Malchus. Then said Jesus unto Peter, Put up thy sword into the sheath: The cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it? ~ John 18:10-1

Jesus’ response to Peter in John 18:11 would indicate that the cup was indeed his sufferings from the time of his arrest till his last breath on the cross. 

And, behold, one of them which were with Jesus stretched out his hand, and drew his sword, and struck a servant of the high priest’s, and smote off his ear. Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword. Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels? But how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be? ~ Matthew 26:51 -54

John 18:11 & Matthew 26:54 refer to the same event.

The cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?” and “how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be.” are two expressions of the same truth, for the Son of man was destined to lay down his life for the sins of all men and be raised again and proclaimed as the Son of God with all power and authority.

JESUS DELIVERED OVER TO DEATH ~ THE SHEPHERD SMITTEN AND THE SHEEP SCATTERED

Awake, O sword, against my shepherd, and against the man that is my fellow, saith the Lord of hosts: smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered: and I will turn mine hand upon the little ones. ~ Zechariah 13:7

Zechariah 13:7 is interpreted in Matthew 26 and Mark 14 during the time of the arrest of Jesus. In Matthew, Jesus had said to his disciples, All ye shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad. ~ Matthew 26:31

Mark ‘s quotation is very similar: And Jesus saith unto them, All ye shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered.

At first glance it might appear that God himself personally smote Jesus and scattered the sheep, but it is my conviction that if we examine this text in view of the context as well as the overall narrative regarding the death of Jesus, we will find that Zechariah’s prophecy speaks to the foreknowledge of God regarding the sacrifice of his Son, Jesus. The things Jesus endured from the time of his arrest until his death on the cross were the ordained will of God for the salvation of sinners. 

When we examine how the New Testament interprets Zechariah’s prophecy, both Matthew and Mark refer to this passage as the fulfillment of prophecy that Jesus would be forsaken by his disciples. The emphasis is placed on the scattering of the sheep. 

Notice how this verse is used within the overall context in Matthew 26:31-35

Then saith Jesus unto them, All ye shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad. But after I am risen again, I will go before you into Galilee. Peter answered and said unto him, Though all men shall be offended because of thee, yet will I never be offended. Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, that this night, before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice. Peter said unto him, Though I should die with thee, yet will I not deny thee. Likewise also said all the disciples. ~ Matthew 26:31-35

Notice that the emphasis is on how the disciples would respond to the arrest of Jesus. Now, let’s continue reading from Matthew 26.

Then cometh Jesus with them unto a place called Gethsemane, and saith unto the disciples, Sit ye here, while I go and pray yonder. And he took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, and began to be sorrowful and very heavy. Then saith he unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death: tarry ye here, and watch with me. And he went a little farther, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt. And he cometh unto the disciples, and findeth them asleep, and saith unto Peter, What, could ye not watch with me one hour? Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak. He went away again the second time, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if this cup may not pass away from me, except I drink it, thy will be done. And he came and found them asleep again: for their eyes were heavy. And he left them, and went away again, and prayed the third time, saying the same words. Then cometh he to his disciples, and saith unto them, Sleep on now, and take your rest: behold, the hour is at hand, and the Son of man is betrayed into the hands of sinners. Rise, let us be going: behold, he is at hand that doth betray me. And while he yet spake, lo, Judas, one of the twelve, came, and with him a great multitude with swords and staves, from the chief priests and elders of the people. ~ Matthew 26:36-47

Remember Zechariah’s prophecy begins with ‘Awake, O sword, against my shepherd…’ Judas, who betrayed Jesus, led a great multitude with swords and staves. God was foretelling by Zechariah the things which were going to happen on the night Jesus was betrayed by Judas into the hands of men. 

Notice what else Zechariah’s prophecy says: “smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered: and I will turn mine hand upon the little ones.”

What could possibly be meant by I will turn mine hands upon the little ones ?” The little ones refer to the sheep (the disciples) who were scattered. The same voice which says: “Smite the shepherd” also says “I will turn my hand upon the little ones.” 

Did God personally scatter the sheep? Is there anything within the context or the gospels which would imply that God was personally causing the disciples to faint during Jesus’ time of grief and sorrow?  

Consider the words of Jesus in Luke 22, And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat: But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.” ~ v. 31

Now let’s continue reading from Matthew. 

Now he that betrayed him gave them a sign, saying, Whomsoever I shall kiss, that same is he: hold him fast. And forthwith he came to Jesus, and said, Hail, master; and kissed him. And Jesus said unto him, Friend, wherefore art thou come? Then came they, and laid hands on Jesus and took him. And, behold, one of them which were with Jesus stretched out his hand, and drew his sword, and struck a servant of the high priest’s, and smote off his ear. Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword. ~ Matthew 26:48-52 

Notice that it wasn’t by the sword that Jesus was smitten, even though Zechariah’s prophecy had said, “Awake, O sword, against my shepherd, and against the man that is my fellow.” Jesus actually stopped what could have been a very bloody scene. But it was at this time during his passion that Jesus was forsaken by his disciples as was prophesied by the scriptures. Jesus goes one to say, Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels? But how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be? ~ v. 53

Jesus could have prayed and received deliverance. This would not have been so if God were personally opposing him (smiting him) in that hour. Jesus wasn’t slain against his will. When he was arrested, he had already taken up his cross by his surrendered obedience to the will of His Father.

Even though those who hated him had sought to kill him from the beginning, they could not touch his life until the Father delivered him into their hands and this did not begin to happen until Jesus gave Judas the command: “What you are going to do, do quickly. ~ John 13:27 

Jesus was given the authority to lay down His life and to take it up again: and though they came with a band of soldiers to take him by force, he was in complete control even as he had been from the beginning. In fact, John tells us that when Jesus told those who came to arrest him who he was, those with the swords and staves went backward and fell to the ground.

Judas then, having received a band of men and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees, cometh thither with lanterns and torches and weapons. Jesus therefore, knowing all things that should come upon him, went forth, and said unto them, Whom seek ye? They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them. As soon then as he had said unto them, I am he, they went backward, and fell to the ground. ~ John 18:3-5

Jesus certainly could have escaped had he chosen too. 

Now, let’s continue:

In that same hour said Jesus to the multitudes, Are ye come out as against a thief with swords and staves for to take me? I sat daily with you teaching in the temple, and ye laid no hold on me. But all this was done, that the scriptures of the prophets might be fulfilled. Then all the disciples forsook him, and fled. ~ Matthew 26:55-56

Notice how at the beginning of the context in Matthew 26:31, Jesus interprets Zachariah 13:7 as being fulfilled by the disciples forsaking him. Then towards the end of the same context (verse 56) Matthew says: ‘then all the disciples forsook him and fled.’ 

This is the fulfillment of the scripture spoken in Zechariah 13:7.

We must be careful not to create a scenario that the New Testament does not give based on the words “I will smite the shepherd” which is a reference to God’s divine purposes and foreknowledge. Remember that Jesus could have had more than 12 legions of angels at his disposal, even after he prayed through, denying his will for the will of God, 

O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt. ~ v. 39

It was God’s will for Jesus to be delivered over to death, not delivered from death. Yet in no way did God become opposed to Jesus for that to happen. Jesus took up the cross because it was the Father’s will that he do so and Jesus always did those things that pleased the Father. Thus Jesus laid down his life of his own free will in obedience to the Father’s will to fulfill all that was written concerning him. God did not personally condemn him or afflict him. 

The phrase “I will smite the shepherd” refers specifically to the word of God foretelling in advance what would happen according to the will of God. It does not refer in any way to an angry God pouring out his wrath on his innocent Son. 

The Bible clearly reveals that the offering of Jesus was the gift of God. God was the one who sent his Son to be the sacrifice for our sins. The scriptures had foretold of the Messiah’s death for his people and Christ laid down his life to fulfill the scriptures. In this way he was smitten by God.  

By the divine counsel and wisdom of God he was delivered over to death for our sins (Acts 2:23; Romans 4:24-25; Romans 8:32).  Yet he was unjustly murdered by the hands of wicked men who actually carried out what the scriptures foresaw. 

If we interpret the cross as the wrath of God’s justice whereby God turned against his innocent Son, we face a major conundrum because we have now placed the justice of God at the scene of the crime, and the scriptures clearly state that Jesus was deprived of justice (Isaiah 53:7-8; Acts 8:33) and suffered wrongfully (1 Peter 1:19-25). 

When Jesus suffered and died for us, he was literally showing us the Father’s love for us. 

For even Christ pleased not himself; but, as it is written, The reproaches of them that reproached thee fell on me. ~ Romans 15:3

May those words “the reproaches of them that reproached thee fell on me resonate with us all. And may the Lord give us all understanding.

LOSING THE CALL OF GOD FOR MINISTRY

It seems that in recent times there have been more ministry scandals than I can remember in years gone by. Especially among long tenured ministers.

But why?

When ministry becomes one’s career, it is very easy to lose the passion for the call of God that led you into the ministry in the first place. When ministry becomes an occupation rather than obedience from the heart, one might be  more inclined to cover sin than to deal with in head on.

Obedience to the call of God demands that we walk with God and seek his face, while keeping our hearts and lives clean so that we can do his will. This is what burns in the heart of every person who senses the call of God to any real ministry. We want to be right with God so as to please him and fulfill what he has called us to do.

When a called person loses this, they lose the ministry to which they were called. Real ministry is to be done from a pure heart and a clean life. Too many paid ministers have lost their calling and are now serving for a paycheck.

Those who are called by God while working for a living outside of ministry don’t tend to have the same issues with covering up sin as those who are ministers by profession. I am sure there are exceptions, but for the most part those who feel called by God desire to obey him and tend to seek God’s face and shun sin and ungodliness.

Their ministry depends on their devotion to God (their prayer time, study of God’s word, and commitment to service unto the Lord). If they fall into sin, they either repent and make things right or stop ministering altogether.

When ministry becomes a job for a paycheck, it’s easy to lose the passion for the call of God in your life. If the truth were known, I think we would find that many “professional” ministers have very limited skills, if any beyond their ministry career. They would be completely lost if they had to rely on a non ministry job to pay their bills.

Professional ministry tends to cover sins because exposing sin is bad for business. In other words, it could affect the pay check. When a paycheck is not in the equation, it’s much easier to stay focused on what the Lord would have you do, and to take a break if you need time to get things in your life right with God.

While there is nothing wrong with being supported in ministry, we must always remember that ministry is a calling and not a business opportunity. Whether you are a salaried minister or you minister with no financial support, make sure to serve God from the heart as one who has answered the call of God and will give an account to Him.

OUR SABBATH REST

The Sabbath command was given to Israel as part of their covenant with God, but there is no command in the New Testament for Gentile believers to observe the Sabbath as given to Israel under Moses.

In Acts 15 when the Jerusalem council concluded that the Gentiles were under no obligation to come under the requirements of the law of Moses, they gave them the following directives: abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication. ~ Acts 15:20

They made no recommendation to the Gentiles that they should keep the Sabbath, and never did anywhere in the book of Acts.

In Colossians 2 Paul says to the Gentiles, Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ. ~ v. 16-17

Notice that Paul makes a distinction between the feast days (holy days as the KJV renders it above) and the weekly Sabbath in this text. The Greek word for Sabbath in this verse is the same Greek word that refers to the weekly Sabbath elsewhere in the New Testament and the Greek word used for the feast days is the same that is used throughout the New Testament for the Jewish feasts such as Passover and unleavened bread.

Notice also that Paul refers to the Sabbath as a shadow of things to come, and follows that statement sayings, but the body is of Christ. The NIV’s rendering is actually much clearer than the KJV.

These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ. ~ Colossians 2:17 NIV

Let that resonate, the fulfillment of what was foreshadowed in the Sabbath is found in Christ.

Like Paul in his letter to the Colossians, the author of Hebrews also refers to such observances as shadows of things to come. Not a shadow of things to come from our vantage point, but from the vantage point of those who were under the law.

Thus the truths foreshadowed in the keeping of the weekly Sabbath by the Jews is fulfilled in the person of Jesus Christ, for Jesus Christ is our Sabbath rest. In Hebrews 4, the author of Hebrews speaking of the meaning of Sabbath rest says, For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day. There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God;  for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his. ~ Hebrews 4:8-10  NIV

Israel’s entrance into the promised land, their yearly feasts (which were also Sabbaths) and their weekly Sabbath were all foreshadowings of the rest that God intends for his people in Christ Jesus.

When the instructions of the covenants transitioned from the old to the new, the Jews continued in their traditions which were part of their culture and daily lives, and meanwhile the Gentiles also came into the covenant of grace.

There were some among the Jews who attempted to persuade the Gentiles to follow Jewish customs as part of their new found faith. Paul opposed such demands, knowing that true relationship with God through Christ has to do with circumcision of the heart and not the flesh, for what Israel was given as a type and a shadow under the law was now a reality in the person of Jesus Christ.

When Jesus spoke of the future Sabbaths (example., pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day ~ Matthew 24) he was referring to the time of the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple when the Jews would be scattered. This would happen within the generation of 40 years after his crucifixion and resurrection.

The New Testament goes to great lengths to teach us that those who come to faith in Christ are under no commandment to keep a weekly Sabbath, though there are valuable truths we can learn from it not only as it pertains to our rest in Christ, but the practice of taking a day to rest is a divine pattern that anyone can benefit from, and I’d encourage you to do exactly that.

We were not designed to work without rest. Our bodies and our minds need to rest from labor. So there is a lot we can learn and apply from the weekly Sabbath that the children of Israel were commanded to keep, but we must make the distinction that we (who are Gentiles in the flesh) have been given no such commandment.

The primary reason God gave the children of Israel the weekly Sabbath was for rest, as a gift to them. They were to remember that they had been slaves to the Egyptians, but the One True God who created all things, had delivered them. They were now God’s servants, and were no longer slaves to taskmasters. They were to be the servants of the Living God who rested from all his works on the seventh day. God wanted them to follow his example and learn how to treat those who were their servants by allowing them to rest as well.

Observe the Sabbath day by keeping it holy, as the Lord your God has commanded you. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant, nor your ox, your donkey or any of your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns, so that your male and female servants may rest, as you do. Remember that you were slaves in Egypt and that the Lord your God brought you out of there with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm. Therefore the Lord your God has commanded you to observe the Sabbath day. ~ Deuteronomy 5:12-15 NIV

The Sabbath’s ultimate intent was to remind the people that they were serving the Living God who is the creator of Heaven and earth (thus they were to worship him and be consecrated to him alone). God rested on the Sabbath day because he had finished his work, not because he was tired. Israel on the other hand was to rest from their labors because of the toll work takes on the body and mind. Yet God had loftier things in mind as he was foreshadowing the rest for weary and burdened souls in the person of his Son, Jesus Christ, in whom the work of God is complete for our souls. 

The Sabbath command in the Ten Commandments is the only outward religious or ceremonial observance that is part of the Ten Commandments. All other commands have to do with the heart and how one lives. Under the law, an Israelite could actually keep the weekly Sabbath command while breaking the other Commandments. Thus Jesus addressed the hypocrisy of observing religious rites from wrong hearts when he exposed the religious bondage of the Pharisees regarding the Sabbath.

All the conduct from the heart commands (worship God only, don’t lie, don’t steal, don’t commit adultery, etc.,) are still applicable and built into the very fiber of New Testament teachings and doctrine, but the outward ceremonial observance of the weekly Sabbath isn’t. However, that which was foreshadowed in the Sabbath, rest or abiding in Christ is the most essential, as it gives life to our service to God. 

In Matthew 11 Jesus said, Come unto me, all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light. ~ Matthew 11:27-30

Right after this Jesus walked through some fields with his disciples on the Sabbath day and technically they broke the Sabbath by eating some of the grain from the fields. This aroused condemnation from the Pharisees. In response Jesus cited two accounts from the scriptures where the breaking of the Sabbath occurred, and he did so to defend his and his disciples’ innocence.

He answered, “Haven’t you read what David did when he and his companions were hungry? He entered the house of God, and he and his companions ate the consecrated bread—which was not lawful for them to do, but only for the priests. Or haven’t you read in the Law that the priests on Sabbath duty in the temple desecrate the Sabbath and yet are innocent? I tell you that something greater than the temple is here. If you had known what these words mean, ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the innocent. For the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath.” ~ Matthew 12:3-8 NIV

Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath, and his disciples were with him, so they were innocent of any charges brought against them by the religious hypocrites who used the law to tie heavy and cumbersome loads on others. The Sabbath was not given to make us slaves to the bondage of religion, but to free us from the slavery of sin, and to bring us into the joyous rest of the Lord, who Himself is our Sabbath rest.

The work is finished, and we are complete in him in whom all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form.

KING JAMES ONLY? HMM… NOT SURE ABOUT THAT

Recently I have stumbled upon the King James only crowd. Now, I knew they were out there, but I had never taken the time to pay much attention to their views, but wow, they are pretty extreme in my opinion.

Now before I continue, allow me to say that I personally like the KJV. I have used the KJV for scripture references in my writing more than any other translation of the Bible. There are multiple reasons why I have done this. One is that the KJV is generally recognized and accepted by most Christians, even by those who prefer a different translation. Another reason is that I simply did not want to deal with people who might complain about my using a translation they viewed as corrupt, so the KJV was a safe translation to use. I also used it because I actually like it, and because it is in the public domain, so I didn’t need to be concerned about any copyright issues.

With that being said, I am not a King James only advocate, and quite honestly I don’t comprehend how anyone who actually gives any time to critical thought on the issue could take such a position. It’s one thing to prefer the KJV version, it’s another to claim that it is the authorized version and all other English translations are corrupt.

I find the argument that the KJV is the only reliable English translation, while all other English translations are corrupt, sadly lacking any sound reasoning. Now, this will not be an exhaustive rebuttal to King James only, not by any means, but maybe it will help others sort through the confusion.

Before starting this article, I came across another article titled, “Why I Am King James Only.” Now, in the interest of full disclosure, I did not read all of the article, but I read enough to draw an example from that I see from the KJ only crowd.

The author of the article talked about the time when he switched from the KJV to another translation many years ago and later discovered that the other translation was corrupt. The other translation was NASV according to his article, but I think he meant the NASB because the two “corrupted” texts which he cites reads exactly as it appears in the NASB.

One of the verses referenced was Luke 2:33. Here is how they appear in the NASB in contrast to the KJV.

And His father and mother were amazed at the things which were being said about Him. ~ NASB

And
Joseph and his mother marvelled at those things which were spoken of him. ~ KJV

Because Joseph and Mary were referred to as Jesus’s father and mother in the NASB (which is a reference to Jesus in his childhood), the writer of the article has ascertained that the NASB was denying the virgin birth of Jesus Christ. He writes: Did you notice the difference in the two versions? In the NASV, Luke 2:33 refers to Joseph as the father of Christ which would deny the Virgin birth.

Full stop! No it doesn’t. 


This is the kind of thing I am referring to when I speak of the need for critical thought. If the NASB were trying to deny the virgin birth, why would there be the detailed account of the angel Gabriel appearing to the virgin Mary, telling her that she is pregnant and will give birth to the Son of God, Jesus?

Now in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city in Galilee named Nazareth, to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the descendants of David; and the virgin’s name was Mary. And coming in, he said to her, “Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you.” But she was very perplexed at this statement, and was pondering what kind of greeting this was. And the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and give birth to a son, and you shall name Him Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David; and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and His kingdom will have no end.” But Mary said to the angel, “How will this be, since I am a virgin?” The angel answered and said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; for that reason also the holy Child will be called the Son of God. ~ Luke 1:26-35 NASB

How can anyone read these verses and reach the conclusion that the NASB is denying virgin birth in 2:33? Yet this is the kind of thinking I see among the KJ only crowd. They seem to like cherry picking certain texts and projecting onto those texts accusations that are easily proven to be false.

And it gets even worse, I recently came across a King James only advocate who claimed that the King James Bible supersedes the Hebrew and the Greek. He has a YouTube Video with that very title.

Hearing someone claim that the KJV somehow supersedes the original texts which were given by the Holy Spirit to the prophets, apostles, and holy men of God is quite disturbing, especially when we consider that Jesus’s incarnation, death, resurrection, and ascension were the fulfillment of what was written in the holy scriptures concerning him.

Jesus fulfilled those scriptures more than 1500 years before King James was even born, so no one should elevate the King James Version as being the authorized Word of God and superior to the Hebrew and Greek manuscripts of the scriptures. Without the Hebrew and Greek texts, the KJV would not exist.

How anyone could promote the idea that elevates the KJV to the status of the scroll of the book of Isaiah that Jesus read from when he said “this day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears” is beyond me. Many scriptures were fulfilled many centuries before the KJV translation existed. It cannot possibly supersede what it is translating.

Furthermore, the King James Version was translated from later manuscripts which date from the 5th to the 12th century. In contrast, the NIV was translated using earlier manuscripts than the KJV. The NIV does not answer to the KJV, but to the manuscripts from which it was translated.

Even so, the King James Only crowd likes to pile on the NIV as corrupt, but it only takes a little investment of one’s time to find out that their claims are flawed.

One argument that is made is that other translations such as the NIV detracts from the deity of Christ. For example, the NIV uses the words, one and only rather than only begotten, when referring to Jesus as the Son of God.  Yet, these expressions are saying the same exact thing. A translation does not have to use the words only begotten to communicate that Jesus is God’s only Son, having the same divine nature as God the Father.

Another text that the King James Only crowd makes an issue of is 1 Timothy 3:16, which in the KJV says, God was manifest in the flesh.

And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. ~ KJV

I actually love this translation that God was manifest in the flesh, but if it is worded differently in another translation that does not mean that it is corrupted. For example, the NIV rendering of the same text says the following.

Beyond all question, the mystery from which true godliness springs is great: He appeared in the flesh, was vindicated by the Spirit, was seen by angels, was preached among the nations, was believed on in the world, was taken up in glory. ~ NIV

Using the pronoun “He” in 1 Timothy 3:16 is not an attack on the deity of Christ. How can you attack the deity of Christ when you say “He” in whom the mystery of godliness is revealed, has appeared in the flesh? That is exactly what the NIV is saying.

The one in whom the mystery of godliness dwells appeared in the flesh. No other person in scripture is spoken of as appearing in the flesh. Not Abraham, not Moses, Not David, not the prophets, not anyone. Only Jesus. The declaration that the mystery of godliness has been revealed because “He appeared in the flesh” speaks overwhelmingly to the deity of Christ.

Now, consider the following texts which all confirm the deity of Christ in the NIV. There are more, but these ought to suffice. If the NIV were corrupt and attempting to detract from the deity of Christ in 1 Timothy 3:16, they would not have overwhelmingly affirmed Christ’s deity in other texts.

In Matthew 1:23, the NIV confirms that the name Immanuel means God with us. Don’t get hung up on the Elizabethan English of the KJV which spells Immanuel with an E instead of an I. They are communicating the same message, that Christ incarnate is God with us.

In Titus 2:13 the NIV refers to Jesus Christ as our great God and Savior.

If the NIV is some sort of corrupt translation that hides the deity of Christ in 1 Timothy 3:16, then why doesn’t it hide the deity of Christ Titus 2:13?

Just a little bit of critical thought would guide a person to consider the whole of a translation’s texts to determine if that translation is in opposition to orthodox truth. The NIV (as with other translations) confirms the deity of Christ over and over again.

Most English translations of Titus 2:13 refer to Jesus as the great God and Savior. One translation says, “Mighty God and our Savior.” Is that translation corrupt because it uses the word mighty rather than great? Absolutely not! God is referred to as mighty in the scriptures, and in the KJV! Thus, no one should have a problem with it because it is a good rendering of the same truth.

Why anyone needs to explain such is what is most concerning to me. If I say my wife is my bride, I am in no way denying that she is my wife. The fact that all English translations refer to Jesus as God in Titus 2:13 is evidence that there is not a collective effort by those translations to deny his deity.

In Colossians 2:9 the NIV says in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form.

In John 8:58, the NIV quotes Jesus as saying,  “before Abraham was born, I am!” The name “I Am” is the name that God told Moses would be his memorial to all generations. When Jesus says “I AM” he is claiming to be God and the NIV doesn’t hide this from us.

Consider the NIV translation of John 1:1-4, 10, and 14

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it. ` v.1-4

He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. ~ v.10

The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth. ~ v.14

All of these verses speak of Christ’s deity. Now consider Colossians 1:15-16 where the NIV once again confirms that Jesus is the creator.

The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him.

The NIV testifies that Jesus is the Almighty God in Revelation 1:8, 17, and 18

“I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God, “who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty.” ~ v. 8

When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last. ~ v. 17

I am the Living One; I was dead, and now look, I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades. ~ v.18

The NIV speaks of Jesus again, as the Word of God in Revelation 19:11-13.

I saw heaven standing open and there before me was a white horse, whose rider is called Faithful and True. With justice he judges and wages war. His eyes are like blazing fire, and on his head are many crowns. He has a name written on him that no one knows but he himself. He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God. ~ Revelation 19:11-13

Furthermore, in Hebrews 1:8 in the NIV speaks of Jesus as God.

But about the Son he says, “Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever; a scepter of justice will be the scepter of your kingdom.
There are other texts that could be given, but these ought to be enough to show that the NIV is not a corrupt translation that detracts from the deity of Christ. Making such claims is simply a false witness.

It is fine to love and cherish the KJV, and there is nothing wrong with it being a person’s favorite version or only choice they want to read and study, but to refer to other translations as corrupt because of your personal bias is not good.

We need to mature in our thinking.