THE BIBLICAL NARRATIVE OF THE CROSS AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS ~ Lesson #2, This is the Lord’s doing and it is marvelous in our eyes

In the New Testament, Jesus confronted the leaders of Israel for their part in the continued rejection of God’s servants who were sent to Israel. By their rejection of Jesus, they were complicit in the persecution and blood shedding of all the prophets and righteous men throughout Israel’s history.

And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers. Woe unto you! for ye build the sepulchres of the prophets, and your fathers killed them. Truly ye bear witness that ye allow the deeds of your fathers: for they indeed killed them, and ye build their sepulchres. Therefore also said the wisdom of God, I will send them prophets and apostles, and some of them they shall slay and persecute. That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required of this generation; From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation. Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered. And as he said these things unto them, the scribes and the Pharisees began to urge him vehemently, and to provoke him to speak of many things: Laying wait for him, and seeking to catch something out of his mouth, that they might accuse him. ~ Luke 11:46-54

Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous, And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city: That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar. Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation. O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate. ~ Matthew 23:29 -38

These two sections of scripture may seem as if they have absolutely nothing to do with the cross and resurrection of Jesus, but in fact, they do because they are part of the backdrop that leads to the scandal of the cross

With these two sections of scripture in mind, let’s read again from Matthew 21:33-42 where Jesus gives the parable of the vineyard.

Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country: And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it. And the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another. Again, he sent other servants more than the first: and they did unto them likewise. But last of all he sent unto them his son, saying, They will reverence my son. But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance. And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him. ~ Matthew 21:33-39

Notice how the parable of the vineyard runs parallel with the words of Jesus to the leaders of Israel in the two opening sections of scripture above (Luke 11:46-54 and Matthew 23:29 -38).

Within the story of Israel, the death of Jesus is the culmination of the rejection of the God of Israel by his people. This is a sobering truth, but it is also one that will bring us into a greater sense of humility and love for the grace and mercy of God because we all deserve judgment.

Thankfully, the parable of the vineyard does not end at verse 39 with the death of the Son. We have 3 more verses that lead our eyes to the resurrection of God’s Son.

When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen? They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons. Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? ~ Matthew 21:40-42 

Jesus is the stone the builders rejected, and as we move forward we are going to unpack that even further, but for now I want to draw you attention to what is said immediately afterwards, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner.

The rejected stone (rejected by men) is the stone that God has chosen as the cornerstone. According to the scriptures, this is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes!

In the Bible, when we read about Jesus as the stone the builders rejected, this refers to the sufferings of Christ. When we read about Jesus as the cornerstone, that is resurrection language. The resurrected Christ is the foundational stone of the house of God in God’s new creation.

Therefore thus saith the Lord God, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste. ~ Isaiah 28:16

In the parable of the vineyard, Jesus asks “Did ye never read in the scriptures that the rejected stone would become the cornerstone?”

This was God’s foreordained plan and is that which had been told to us by the prophets. The stone which the builders refused has become the head stone of the corner. This is the Lord’s doing; it is marvelous in our eyes. ~Psalm 118:22-23

I can not stress enough how important it is for us to grasp the impact of these words, “This is the Lord’s doing; it is marvelous in our eyes.” This is the Lord’s doing. Not the theories, but this. In our first lesson I referenced that there are multiple theories (views) that are taught regarding the atonement. These theories serve as a framework endeavoring to explain the cross. Yet none of them have as their foundation the rejected stone becoming the cornerstone, which is the Lord’s doing within the story of Israel.

The theories (moral influence, ransom, Christus victor, satisfaction, penal substitution, governmental, and scapegoat theory), all have aspects of truth, but none of them can open our understanding regarding the cross and resurrection like the biblical narrative can.

We are just getting started in this study, and I hope you will continue to follow along. Until our next lesson, remember that Jesus, who was rejected by men, was chosen by God and this is the Lord’s doing! And when you see it, it will be marvelous in your eyes. 

Until lesson #3, blessings…

THE BIBLICAL NARRATIVE OF THE CROSS AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS ~ Lesson #1, The Parable of the Vineyard

In Matthew 21:33-42, Jesus gives the parable of the vineyard as an illustration regarding his death and resurrection within the context of God’s relationship with Israel. This parable is also recored in Mark 12:1-12 and Luke 20:9-18. Let’s begin by reading verses 33-39 in Matthew 21.

Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country: And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it. And the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another. Again, he sent other servants more than the first: and they did unto them likewise. But last of all he sent unto them his son, saying, They will reverence my son. But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance. And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him. ~ Matthew 21:33-39

The words emphasized in bold and italicized font in the verses above represent key truths that will help us understand the biblical narrative regarding the cross and resurrection of Jesus. Let’s take a look at each of them and give a brief definition of what they represent.

1. The householder who planted a vineyard represents God himself. 

2. The vineyard is the nation of Israel. 

3. The husbandmen are the leaders and rulers within Israel.

4. The servants are the prophets and righteous men that God sent to Israel and their leaders.

5. The Son, who is also the heir, is Jesus.

Now before we move forward let’s look at some verses which refer to Israel as God’s vineyard.

Thou hast brought a vine out of Egypt: thou hast cast out the heathen, and planted it. Thou preparedst room before it, and didst cause it to take deep root, and it filled the land. ~ Psalm 80:8-9 

Now I will sing to my wellbeloved a song of my beloved touching his vineyard. My wellbeloved hath a vineyard in a very fruitful hill: And he fenced it, and gathered out the stones thereof, and planted it with the choicest vine, and built a tower in the midst of it, and also made a winepress therein: and he looked that it should bring forth grapes, and it brought forth wild grapes. And now, O inhabitants of Jerusalem, and men of Judah, judge, I pray you, betwixt me and my vineyard. What could have been done more to my vineyard, that I have not done in it? Wherefore, when I looked that it should bring forth grapes, brought it forth wild grapes? And now go to; I will tell you what I will do to my vineyard: I will take away the hedge thereof, and it shall be eaten up; and break down the wall thereof, and it shall be trodden down: And I will lay it waste: it shall not be pruned, nor digged; but there shall come up briers and thorns: I will also command the clouds that they rain no rain upon it. For the vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah his pleasant plant: and he looked for judgment, but behold oppression; for righteousness, but behold a cry. ~ Isaiah 5:1-7

Yet I had planted thee
a noble vine, wholly a right seed: how then art thou turned into the degenerate plant of a strange vine unto me? ~ Jeremiah 2:21 

Israel’s role as the vineyard of the Lord is extremely important to remember in any study of the cross and resurrection of Jesus, because the death and resurrection of Jesus happened within the context of the story of Israel as the vineyard that God planted.

Now, I need you to brace yourself, especially if your foundational views of the cross is not rooted within the context of the story of Israel. Within Western Christianity there has been much debate over different theories of the Atonement, and listed below are some the most prominent ones.

1. The moral influence theory. 

2. The ransom theory.

3. Christus Victor.

4. The satisfaction theory.

5. The Penal Substitutionary theory.

6. The Governmental theory.

7. The scapegoat theory.

These theories are sometimes referred to as models of the Atonement, and are presented as a framework to understand the crucifixion of Jesus. Though they all have some aspects of truth, there is one thing that they all have in common: they are not predicated on the story of Israel. The biblical narrative in the New Testament regarding the cross and resurrection of Jesus is given to us within the context of the story of Israel.

To be sure, Bible verses can be stringed together to support any of the theories of Atonement referenced above, but none of them are the narrative given to us in the New Testament. The narrative regarding Christ’s death and resurrection as given to us in the New Testament is referred to as the gospel in the book of Acts. In fact, we have approximately 7 gospel sermons recorded in the book of Acts and everyone of them places the cross and resurrection within the context of the story of Israel.

If we omit the story of Israel, we do not have the biblical view of the cross and resurrection. We only have theories. Theories can have some good points, but they can also be cluttered with false ideas rooted in pagan philosophy and thought.

Almost all of Western Christianity has been indoctrinated with theories of the Atonement rather than the biblical narrative. Nothing speaks to reality of this more than the way that God’s role in the death of Christ is understood.

In this study, I appeal to you to be patient with me and consider the truths I am going to present to you from the narrative given to us in the New Testament. The more we see and understand the biblical narrative, the less appealing theories of the Atonement will be. When the cross is understood within the context of the narrative, the resurrection takes on a whole new meaning.

Lacking in most, if not all theories of the Atonement, is the powerful, life changing work of God in the resurrection and exaltation of Jesus. In the biblical narrative, the resurrection and exaltation of Jesus is not an afterthought, but the beginning of new creation in the Messiah.

The theories of Atonement often fail the biblical narrative because of one underlying concept more than any other, and that is the role that God the Father had in the death of his Son.

If we understand the cross and resurrection within the context of the story of Israel (i.e., Israel’s covenantal relationship with God from Abraham to Christ), our minds will be renewed to the Lord’s doing, and it will be as was prophesied, marvelous in our eyes! While it may be painful to unlearn some of the indoctrination of the theories, waiting for us on the other side is a fresh and powerful understanding of the resurrection that we have never had before.

The parable of the vineyard will be our launching point into this study of the cross and resurrection of Jesus, and as we journey through the narrative given to us in the New Testament, we will see over and over again that the parable of the vineyard is the perfect framework for properly understanding what actually happened when Christ died and rose again.

As we can see in the parable of the vineyard, the Lord of the vineyard (which is a portrait of God the Father) was not the one condemning his Son. Instead, it was the husbandmen who mistreated and killed the Son. They did to the Son as they had done to the other servants which the Lord of the vineyard had sent to them.

This is a portrait of all the prophets and righteous men that God had sent to Israel and their leaders, to call them to repentance and to be his fruitful vineyard. Yet they continued to rebel. Finally, God sent his only begotten Son and they rejected him and put him to death.

This is a good point to end this first lesson. We will pick up here in lesson #2.

Blessings…

THE CUP FROM WHICH OUR LORD DID DRINK

Then cometh Jesus with them unto a place called Gethsemane, and saith unto the disciples, Sit ye here, while I go and pray yonder. And he took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, and began to be sorrowful and very heavy. Then saith he unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death: tarry ye here, and watch with me. And he went a little farther, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt.~  Matthew 26:36-39

It has been suggested that the cup to which Jesus makes reference is none other than the cup of God’s wrath. But is it? Those who advocate that Christ suffered under the wrath of God will sometimes refer to this mention of the cup as evidence to support their theory.

Indeed, there are scriptures which reference the cup of God’s wrath. For example: Psalm 75:8; Isaiah 51:17; Jeremiah 25:15-17; Ezekiel 23:32-34; and Habakkuk 2:16 all use the cup as a metaphor to refer to God’s wrath which comes on the ungodly and not on the godly.

Consider for example the following from Psalm 75.

But God is the judge: he putteth down one, and setteth up another. For in the hand of the Lord there is a cup, and the wine is red; it is full of mixture; and he poureth out of the same: but the dregs thereof, all the wicked of the earth shall wring them out, and drink them. ~ Psalm 75:7-8

Now notice what the Psalmist says next:

But I will declare forever; I will sing praises to the God of Jacob. All the horns of the wicked also will I cut off; but the horns of the righteous shall be exalted. ~ Psalm 75:9-10

When Zacharias (the father of John the Baptist) was filled with the Holy Spirit, he prophesied saying, Blessed be the Lord God of Israel; for he hath visited and redeemed his people, And hath raised up an horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David… ~ Luke 1:67-69

Jesus is the horn of our salvation. In 2 Samuel David declared, The God of my rock; in him will I trust: he is my shield, and the horn of my salvation, my high tower, and my refuge, my saviour; thou savest me from violence. ~ v.3

In Psalm 89 we read the following: Blessed is the people that know the joyful sound: they shall walk, O Lord, in the light of thy countenance. In thy name shall they rejoice all the day: and in thy righteousness shall they be exalted. For thou art the glory of their strength: and in thy favour our horn shall be exalted. ~ v.15-17 

Jesus never ceased to be the horn of our Salvation, thus he never ceased to be the one God favored and in whom we find favor. What so many fail to understand is this all points to the power of the resurrection of Jesus.

If we envision a God who suddenly turned on Jesus, we will never truly grasp the power and glory of his resurrection. Jesus was not abandoned by God nor was he the object of God’s wrath. Jesus always did those things that pleased the Father, and when he laid down his life it was as a sweet fragrance to God, in obedient surrender to the Father’s will.

When Jesus died, he surrendered all to the will of the Father, and lovingly forgave those who were putting him to death. This he did by the grace of God, not as the whipping board for God’s anger.

It truly is disheartening that some have to reach for such texts as Jesus asking for the cup to pass from him if possible and projecting onto that the idea of the cup of God’s wrath. God’s wrath does not come upon the innocent, the just, the pure, or the holy. To claim that this was the cup of God’s wrath is to literally change the very nature and character of God at the darkest hour when his Son trusted him.

If we could but envision a Holy God who raised his Son from the dead because he is just and exalts the righteous, the image of an angry God who needed to take vengeance would melt away.

With regards to the metaphorical language of the cup, we see it used in other ways in scripture that have nothing to do with God’s wrath. For instance, Jeremiah 16:7 speaks of the cup of consolation, Psalm 116:13 refers to the cup of salvation, 1 Corinthians 10:16 mentions the cup of blessing, and Psalm 23:5 tells of the overflowing cup

Consistently the word “cup” is used within scripture as a metaphor but what specifically does it refer to when Jesus employs the use of it in the Garden of Gethsemane?

Well, we can be certain that Jesus drank from the cup of suffering because he laid down his life for our sins. The wages of sin is death, not the wrath of God. The wrath of God comes on those who refuse to turn from their sin, who love their sin, and who despise truth and righteousness.

Now let’s consider what actually happened when Jesus was in the garden of Gethsemane. 

Then cometh Jesus with them unto a place called Gethsemane, and saith unto the disciples, Sit ye here, while I go and pray yonder. And he took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, and began to be sorrowful and very heavy. ~ Matthew 26:36-37

Notice that Jesus took with him Peter and the 2 sons of Zebedee. We’ll come back to this shortly, but let’s continue:

Then saith he unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death: tarry ye here, and watch with me. And he went a little farther, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt. And he cometh unto the disciples, and findeth them asleep, and saith unto Peter, What, could ye not watch with me one hour? Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak. He went away again the second time, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if this cup may not pass away from me, except I drink it, thy will be done. ~ Matthew 26:38-42

Notice that the cup is contextually the will of God for Jesus during this hour  –  if this cup may not pass away from me, except I drink it, thy will be done.

Let’s continue:

And he came and found them asleep again: for their eyes were heavy. And he left them, and went away again, and prayed the third time, saying the same words. Then cometh he to his disciples, and saith unto them, Sleep on now, and take your rest: behold, the hour is at hand, and the Son of man is betrayed into the hands of sinners. Rise, let us be going: behold, he is at hand that doth betray me. And while he yet spake, lo, Judas, one of the twelve, came, and with him a great multitude with swords and staves, from the chief priests and elders of the people. ~ Matthew  26:43-47

Jesus was to endure the betrayal, the arrest, the trial, the mockery, the humiliation, and the suffering of death. This was the cup he was to drink from. There is nothing in context that suggests that Jesus is referring to becoming the subject of God’s wrath when he mentions the cup he was to drink from.

Notice that Jesus took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee. The sons of Zebedee (James and John) had recently been asked by Jesus’ Are you able to drink of the cup that I am going to drink and to be baptized with the baptism that I am going to be baptized with?” To which they responded, We are able ~ Matthew 20:20.

Why would Jesus ask them if they could drink of the cup he would drink from, if his cup was the wrath of God? Notice what Jesus says to them when they said, we are able.

And he saith unto them, Ye shall drink indeed of my cup, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with: but to sit on my right hand, and on my left, is not mine to give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father. ~ Matthew 20:23

Notice that Jesus affirms that they would indeed drink of the cup that Jesus himself would drink. This may very well be the reason he took them with him, along with Peter, as he prayed in Gethsemane. It seems that Jesus, even in this hour of grief, was teaching his disciples what it truly meant to drink from his cup, for they called to suffer for his sake.

When Jesus said, My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death, there must have been a desire for his friends to be near him in his deepest time of trouble and sorrow. Jesus was tempted in all points as we are and just as we need friends near in times of distress, so Jesus must have longed for his friends to be there for him. Jesus asks, “…tarry ye here, and watch with me.” 

There certainly is strong evidence that the cup refers to the sufferings that Jesus was about to experience (v.45-46) and this becomes even more apparent when we consider John 18:10-11 along with Matthew 26:51-54 which refer to the same event

Then Simon Peter having a sword drew it, and smote the high priest’s servant, and cut off his right ear. The servant’s name was Malchus. Then said Jesus unto Peter, Put up thy sword into the sheath: The cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it? ~ John 18:10-1

Jesus’ response to Peter in John 18:11 would indicate that the cup was indeed his sufferings from the time of his arrest till his last breath on the cross. 

And, behold, one of them which were with Jesus stretched out his hand, and drew his sword, and struck a servant of the high priest’s, and smote off his ear. Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword. Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels? But how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be? ~ Matthew 26:51 -54

John 18:11 & Matthew 26:54 refer to the same event.

The cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?” and “how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be.” are two expressions of the same truth, for the Son of man was destined to lay down his life for the sins of all men and be raised again and proclaimed as the Son of God with all power and authority.

JESUS DELIVERED OVER TO DEATH ~ THE SHEPHERD SMITTEN AND THE SHEEP SCATTERED

Awake, O sword, against my shepherd, and against the man that is my fellow, saith the Lord of hosts: smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered: and I will turn mine hand upon the little ones. ~ Zechariah 13:7

Zechariah 13:7 is interpreted in Matthew 26 and Mark 14 during the time of the arrest of Jesus. In Matthew, Jesus had said to his disciples, All ye shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad. ~ Matthew 26:31

Mark ‘s quotation is very similar: And Jesus saith unto them, All ye shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered.

At first glance it might appear that God himself personally smote Jesus and scattered the sheep, but it is my conviction that if we examine this text in view of the context as well as the overall narrative regarding the death of Jesus, we will find that Zechariah’s prophecy speaks to the foreknowledge of God regarding the sacrifice of his Son, Jesus. The things Jesus endured from the time of his arrest until his death on the cross were the ordained will of God for the salvation of sinners. 

When we examine how the New Testament interprets Zechariah’s prophecy, both Matthew and Mark refer to this passage as the fulfillment of prophecy that Jesus would be forsaken by his disciples. The emphasis is placed on the scattering of the sheep. 

Notice how this verse is used within the overall context in Matthew 26:31-35

Then saith Jesus unto them, All ye shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad. But after I am risen again, I will go before you into Galilee. Peter answered and said unto him, Though all men shall be offended because of thee, yet will I never be offended. Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, that this night, before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice. Peter said unto him, Though I should die with thee, yet will I not deny thee. Likewise also said all the disciples. ~ Matthew 26:31-35

Notice that the emphasis is on how the disciples would respond to the arrest of Jesus. Now, let’s continue reading from Matthew 26.

Then cometh Jesus with them unto a place called Gethsemane, and saith unto the disciples, Sit ye here, while I go and pray yonder. And he took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, and began to be sorrowful and very heavy. Then saith he unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death: tarry ye here, and watch with me. And he went a little farther, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt. And he cometh unto the disciples, and findeth them asleep, and saith unto Peter, What, could ye not watch with me one hour? Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak. He went away again the second time, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if this cup may not pass away from me, except I drink it, thy will be done. And he came and found them asleep again: for their eyes were heavy. And he left them, and went away again, and prayed the third time, saying the same words. Then cometh he to his disciples, and saith unto them, Sleep on now, and take your rest: behold, the hour is at hand, and the Son of man is betrayed into the hands of sinners. Rise, let us be going: behold, he is at hand that doth betray me. And while he yet spake, lo, Judas, one of the twelve, came, and with him a great multitude with swords and staves, from the chief priests and elders of the people. ~ Matthew 26:36-47

Remember Zechariah’s prophecy begins with ‘Awake, O sword, against my shepherd…’ Judas, who betrayed Jesus, led a great multitude with swords and staves. God was foretelling by Zechariah the things which were going to happen on the night Jesus was betrayed by Judas into the hands of men. 

Notice what else Zechariah’s prophecy says: “smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered: and I will turn mine hand upon the little ones.”

What could possibly be meant by I will turn mine hands upon the little ones ?” The little ones refer to the sheep (the disciples) who were scattered. The same voice which says: “Smite the shepherd” also says “I will turn my hand upon the little ones.” 

Did God personally scatter the sheep? Is there anything within the context or the gospels which would imply that God was personally causing the disciples to faint during Jesus’ time of grief and sorrow?  

Consider the words of Jesus in Luke 22, And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat: But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.” ~ v. 31

Now let’s continue reading from Matthew. 

Now he that betrayed him gave them a sign, saying, Whomsoever I shall kiss, that same is he: hold him fast. And forthwith he came to Jesus, and said, Hail, master; and kissed him. And Jesus said unto him, Friend, wherefore art thou come? Then came they, and laid hands on Jesus and took him. And, behold, one of them which were with Jesus stretched out his hand, and drew his sword, and struck a servant of the high priest’s, and smote off his ear. Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword. ~ Matthew 26:48-52 

Notice that it wasn’t by the sword that Jesus was smitten, even though Zechariah’s prophecy had said, “Awake, O sword, against my shepherd, and against the man that is my fellow.” Jesus actually stopped what could have been a very bloody scene. But it was at this time during his passion that Jesus was forsaken by his disciples as was prophesied by the scriptures. Jesus goes one to say, Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels? But how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be? ~ v. 53

Jesus could have prayed and received deliverance. This would not have been so if God were personally opposing him (smiting him) in that hour. Jesus wasn’t slain against his will. When he was arrested, he had already taken up his cross by his surrendered obedience to the will of His Father.

Even though those who hated him had sought to kill him from the beginning, they could not touch his life until the Father delivered him into their hands and this did not begin to happen until Jesus gave Judas the command: “What you are going to do, do quickly. ~ John 13:27 

Jesus was given the authority to lay down His life and to take it up again: and though they came with a band of soldiers to take him by force, he was in complete control even as he had been from the beginning. In fact, John tells us that when Jesus told those who came to arrest him who he was, those with the swords and staves went backward and fell to the ground.

Judas then, having received a band of men and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees, cometh thither with lanterns and torches and weapons. Jesus therefore, knowing all things that should come upon him, went forth, and said unto them, Whom seek ye? They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them. As soon then as he had said unto them, I am he, they went backward, and fell to the ground. ~ John 18:3-5

Jesus certainly could have escaped had he chosen too. 

Now, let’s continue:

In that same hour said Jesus to the multitudes, Are ye come out as against a thief with swords and staves for to take me? I sat daily with you teaching in the temple, and ye laid no hold on me. But all this was done, that the scriptures of the prophets might be fulfilled. Then all the disciples forsook him, and fled. ~ Matthew 26:55-56

Notice how at the beginning of the context in Matthew 26:31, Jesus interprets Zachariah 13:7 as being fulfilled by the disciples forsaking him. Then towards the end of the same context (verse 56) Matthew says: ‘then all the disciples forsook him and fled.’ 

This is the fulfillment of the scripture spoken in Zechariah 13:7.

We must be careful not to create a scenario that the New Testament does not give based on the words “I will smite the shepherd” which is a reference to God’s divine purposes and foreknowledge. Remember that Jesus could have had more than 12 legions of angels at his disposal, even after he prayed through, denying his will for the will of God, 

O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt. ~ v. 39

It was God’s will for Jesus to be delivered over to death, not delivered from death. Yet in no way did God become opposed to Jesus for that to happen. Jesus took up the cross because it was the Father’s will that he do so and Jesus always did those things that pleased the Father. Thus Jesus laid down his life of his own free will in obedience to the Father’s will to fulfill all that was written concerning him. God did not personally condemn him or afflict him. 

The phrase “I will smite the shepherd” refers specifically to the word of God foretelling in advance what would happen according to the will of God. It does not refer in any way to an angry God pouring out his wrath on his innocent Son. 

The Bible clearly reveals that the offering of Jesus was the gift of God. God was the one who sent his Son to be the sacrifice for our sins. The scriptures had foretold of the Messiah’s death for his people and Christ laid down his life to fulfill the scriptures. In this way he was smitten by God.  

By the divine counsel and wisdom of God he was delivered over to death for our sins (Acts 2:23; Romans 4:24-25; Romans 8:32).  Yet he was unjustly murdered by the hands of wicked men who actually carried out what the scriptures foresaw. 

If we interpret the cross as the wrath of God’s justice whereby God turned against his innocent Son, we face a major conundrum because we have now placed the justice of God at the scene of the crime, and the scriptures clearly state that Jesus was deprived of justice (Isaiah 53:7-8; Acts 8:33) and suffered wrongfully (1 Peter 1:19-25). 

When Jesus suffered and died for us, he was literally showing us the Father’s love for us. 

For even Christ pleased not himself; but, as it is written, The reproaches of them that reproached thee fell on me. ~ Romans 15:3

May those words “the reproaches of them that reproached thee fell on me resonate with us all. And may the Lord give us all understanding.